canon 135mm f2 astrophotography

200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. +1 for the 135mm lens. You don't have to worry about shopping for a better lens anymore. No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. No more inside shooting with flash! Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. Pocketable. The closest Ive been to the 135mm range is 105mm on my Canon 24-105 zoom. When stopped down to 49mm it really is indistinguishable from an APO, except it shows red chromatic aberration with modified cameras even with the UV/IR block or CLS-CCD filter. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. Unfortunately it is not manufactured in a multicoated version, and produces prominent internal reflection artifacts on very bright stars. Tack sharp even at wide open aperture. We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. RATING. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. Helps me as a beginner a lot "If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. I have only owned my 135mm for less then a year, but already it is one of my top three most used and most fun lenses. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. Voting ends March 8, 2023. If so, which one? They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. AF is accurate and very fast. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. This has several advantages from less demanding tracking accuracy, to being able to use a lower ISO setting. The 135 L handles this well. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. @ Juksu - you're pathologically clueless. Everyone should have one? It just doesn't get any better than this! Tiring. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. Why would I want a 135/2.0 lens when I have a 135/1.8? Check out It disagrees completely with the definition that you give! F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. Preaching to the choir! This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. The only reason i sell this lens is because of versatility. Fit and finish are first-rate as well, with very smooth manual focus operation, and very fast autofocus on the camera. The next 200mm lens of excellent quality is the 200mm F4 Nikkor F which requires the Nikon F to EOS adapter. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. AHAB. Available 03/21/23. #light_bulb I would disagree. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. Already wide open this lens produce some high quality photos. It's bokeh is comparable to the 85mm 1.2 but IMO not as nice. Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. I understand the optical design is quite old. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. Juksu, your point is well taken. Yeah I agree that the sentiment that they were designed to be used stopped down is wrong as they were designed to be used wide open because they had to be for speed (my point above). Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. Latter looks quite professional.. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. What I am trying to avoid is spending another $1,100 on a quality APO, and instead using my existing Nikkor 180mm ED lens with a Baader-modified Canon 450D that I just obtained. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. Super sharp from f2. And it's not the one problem from my L lenses very sad =(, My favourite lens, hands down. Thanks to you I got a Rokinon 14mm f2.8 and a 24mm f 1.4 and am considering this lens at the moment, but wonder how it compares to the Canon 135 mm f/2. Holiday Savings $50 . To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. One way to combat potential soft images and chasing perfect focus all night is to stop the lens down to F/2.8 or even F/4. Seems to me that Michael is pretty new to using long telephoto lenses, he writes that the Samyang is the first he has owned. however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. Great reach for street shots. That means that it doesnt require a robust equatorial telescope mount as a larger, heavier telephoto lens would. (purchased for $970), reviewed March 17th, 2011 SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). The version I have has the mount for Canon EOS camera bodies, but there are several different lens mounts available on Amazon. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. Or just get a zoom that is 24-200mm and you are covered. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. [emailprotected]. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. As soon as e.g. The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. BirdDog P240 40X NDI PTZ Camera. You can go lower, but you have to watch your technique. Hi Thomas As far as I know, the Nikon D500 is not modified for astrophotography out of the box (it includes a built in IR cut filter that blocks much of the 656nm wavelength). There are times that making no comment at all is far more telling than posting negative - and sometimes offensive - ad hominem attacks on the author for daring to show some enthusiasm. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. 2. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. thank you for that great review and also the explanations. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. Thus the enthusiasm has a valid basis but may not be suitable for all shooting conditions. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. Hey Trevor, great article! 30-35% diameter reduction is usually necessary on "good" lenses. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. The logic of this article can be applied to a 200/2.8 as well. You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. I thought I would miss shooting at 200mm, but 135mm is long enough for most portraits and gives a decent amount of compression. The shot of the cat could certainly be improved through cropping, though. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. IS is useful in my f/4 zooms but I don't need it to hand-hold this lens. Nice image, andysea. Reducing aperture with the built-in aperture iris interferes with the light path, and results in eight diffraction spikes around bright star images. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. A lot of lenses today are better than anything money could buy in 1980. Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. I have used and still use the 135MM F/2 l lens. Also, as creative as the wide-field 135mm focal length is, its not practical for smaller DSOs and most galaxies. This is the EF-M series version. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? The duck and cat are really the only good shots. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) Let's dig in. Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. Most of the available 135mm F2 lenses have a very short minimum focusing distance in relation to the focal length, creating a magnification ratio of around 0.2 - 0.25. The reason the 135mm lens was that it was the longest lens that would focus with a Leica rangefinder. I do not like this. Its a no brainer if you use this focal length. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. Standards have risen in recent years. Contrasty but not harsh. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. Focusing a wide open F/2 lens is demanding of the optics, especially on a field of stars in the night sky. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. I mainly use for head shot photography. The other one is the inevitable and persistent regret that, because of chromatic aberration, the full 75mm aperture of this beautiful lens can not be used in full visible spectrum photography. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. Is it possible to get good results on a Baader filter modifed Canon 450D and a good telephoto lens, or do I need to get a good APO? Read on to find out which you should be using and why! if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. f/2! In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? thanks for the tiring patronising lecture and then agreeing with me. Sharp without being harsh. 8MP is plenty for the usual 8x10 or 16x20 portrait print. " Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. Typical L construction. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. 45 minutes. For me, that's enough. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed February 4th, 2010 Sony has added a full-frame 50mm F1.4 prime to its premium 'GM' range of E-mount lenses. Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. (purchased for $900), reviewed November 2nd, 2015 There are, of course, outlierssuch as the legendary unicorn lens Canon EF 200mm F2but that one isn't a great alternative unless you are cool with spending $5,700 and carrying around something about as wieldy as a fire hydrant. Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. In this new review, I focus exclusively on the unprecedented Samyang 135mm f/2, which is primarily designed for portrait and wildlife. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. (purchased for $650), reviewed June 6th, 2008 How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? This thing is a beast in comparison. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. She's cold? Several functions may not work. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. p.s. We always expect to see some drop in performance (particularly corner sharpness) when we move from testing on a sub-frame to a full-frame camera, but the 135mm f/2L turned in a really remarkable performance even at full-frame. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. Focus end stop. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. The image below was captured using a DSLR and 135mm lens on the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mount. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. Many lenses lose their appeal after time, but not this one. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. At under 900USD, it's a steal. Smooth but contrasty. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? Aperture ring. I'm enjoying the Sigma Art 135mm - it's notably sharper than the Canon (which I owned at the same time), and it's f/1.8 instead of f/2. It must not be confused with the much cheaper SMC Takumar, often deceptively advertised as SMC Pentax Takumar, which has the M42 camera thread, and is plagued with unextinguishable blue chromatic aberration. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. I own Samyang 135 f2 for Nikon Mount and indeed it is incredible value lens. Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. People mistake "Bokeh" to blurry background, what is very very common mistake. One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. Do you expect me to gawk? They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. I find neither the cat nor the duck particularly good. The 135 f/2 is not perfect. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. Digital camera types . No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. Yep the speed wars in the 70's that gave us all these bokeh monsters were all about the fact that its hard to get usable images in poor lighting when your film was stuck at iso 80 (or even 400 when you were pushing it). Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. Optics quality, sharp,very special picture, sharpness, clarity, weight, fast, accurate AF (fringe benefit of f/2), price, no IS, makes you regret buying any zoom lenses, compact, very sharp wide open, good color contrast, bokeh, this is the lens. Litepanels Studio X2 Bi-Color LED Fresnel Light. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. Image quality, weight and value for money. Because of some residual chromatic aberration even with the aperture stop, the best focus lies not where the star image is the smallest, but rather just slightly away from infinity, at the point where the star image barely begins to enlarge. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). During the frigid months of winter, my motivation to spend over an hour setting up my complete deep-sky imaging rig dwindles. Will this ever get old? I think youll find that this lens is behind some of the most amazing wide-field astrophotography images online! OM System's latest lens is a whopper of a macro, featuring optical stabilization, full weather sealing, up to 2x magnification and a whole lot more. At $900 US it a relative steal. (And cost less too). He's better than I am on BS, I got to give him that. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. And in their task to get that blurry background, they most often throw their main subject out of focus and/or to focus for anything else in the photograph that would make it, and end results are just "gear porn". One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. Crazy fast AF! It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. CANON LENS FOR ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. It's tiny compared to almost everything else in the 85-135 range, and used properly, it can produce results that hold up to my DC (all other factors being equal such as subject distance, f-stop, lighting, etc.). Equipment used was an astromodified Canon 700D, Samyang 135mm f2, SkyTech Triband filter, Star Adventurer 2i, ZWO mini finder with ASI120MM, guiding with PHD2 and polar alignment using sharpcap. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. the lens is built strong, very strong. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . Deserves to be in the camera hall of fame. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. It's sharp, has very low aberrations, no real distortion and the bokeh is very nice. The colder temperatures will make DSLR astrophotography much more practical, and there are plenty of great targets to choose from. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. But this lens changed my mind. But that 10Mpix is more than enough to make a very good A3-A2 size print, but your technique needs to be very good as even slight misfocus is even more visible and the rendering faults as well. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action.

Why Did Jake Leave Packed To The Rafters, Book Inscription Examples, Articles C